College Women Stressed Out, “Overwhelmed”

[madmax]

travisbickle:

"Here's the truth, WOMEN ARE NEVER SATISFIED. Just when they get exactly what they asked for, they want something else. If they get the man of their dreams, and then press him incessantly to do more, earn more, they still one day decide that they aren't satisfied with him either. Then after they get the divorce they wanted, they complain that men in their new dating marketplace don't want to commit.

One hard working new father told me how he secretly borrowed a lot of money to buy his fat little demanding bitch wife an engagement ring, back when he had proposed. She appeared to be happy. He was secretly still paying off his relative that he had borrowed the money from, when one she blurts out that she was *never* really satisfied with the ring he had picked, said it was "just OK" and she really would have liked a bigger diamond. He told me this while he was often working late, because she had quit her job after their daughter was born. I told him to be careful or in 15 or 20 years he would end up just like me.

Women push for a baby, and don't expect what they'll feel after the baby is born. And even if they don't suffer from postpartum depression, then as soon as the baby grows and becomes more independent, women whine how they miss having a "little baby" to cuddle and hold. I've seen that many times. Never satisfied.

If the woman married a man who didn't make much money, they complain later that they got a crappy divorce settlement. If they steal a fortune from a guy that earned a good dollar, they'll complain that it wasn't as much as they felt they deserved. Even if they drove the guy to the poor house. Never satisfied.

Most of you know that a settled with my ex-wife on $350k guaranteed alimony, not including child extortion and 50/50 split assets. I can't modify it, but at least it isn't lifetime, so one day I'll be done paying. Every year she complains because she has to pay taxes on it, while I get to write it off. She was an accountant by trade, and still signed off on the settlement, only to complain afterwards that she "really screwed up" (her words) that she had *really* expected the whole amount tax free. It doesn't matter that she still "collects" years later and yet gives "nothing" back. She's still NOT satisfied.

Some manginas don't like when I repeat the all or nothing WOMEN CAN NEVER BE SATISFIED. They are too limited to see the bigger picture and realize all of the various considerations.

So here's a slightly different way to say the same thing, WOMEN CAN ONLY BE TEMPORARILY SATISFIED UNTIL THEY INEVITABLY CHANGE THEIR MIND AT ANY UNEXPECTED MOMENT AND COMPLAIN THAT THEY ARE NOT SATISFIED.

One other thing is VERY true about women, and a warning to all men in love with their little cupcake. One day, maybe years down the road, she will definitely no longer be satisfied with him. Here's a little fact I've also witnessed many times, Once a woman is no longer satisfied with a man, HE will NEVER be able to satisfy HER again. She's just passing time until she finds someone else to replace him with, that she *thinks* will satisfy her."

[madmax]

tgc:

"It gave them what they thought they wanted, but as Travis just pointed out - the second they get what they think they want, they immediately start wanting something else.

A comment I made in response to the Spearhead article is that men's time to gloat is coming soon. The bill for 50 years of feminism is starting to come due, and it is going to land squarely in laps of women who are now college age. In order to propel the "yugo grrls" forward they had to cripple an entire generation of boys with Ritalin. Now, high-earning potential husbands to pay off their college debts and finance their McMansions are in short supply.

When the music stops, at least 1 out of 3 of these women will be without a place to sit.

Add in the destabilizing effects of men learning Game and pumping and dumping their way through their 20s and early 30s, and this generation of women is likely to get less of what they really want than any before them.

And, having alienated so many men, they aren't even going to get so much as a "there, there, dear" from a lot of them."

[madmax]

spidey wrote:

"There is a simply lesson in life

Never forget that what you have now, was what you wanted before i.e. appreciate what you have.

Women can never be happy because not only do they fail to appreciate how lucky they are, but what they want is often paradoxical and illogical in nature.

They want a man who excites them, but is at the same time, reliable and dependable. It doesn't take a genius to realise that safety and fun are usually in the opposite ends of the spectrum.

They will reject alot of good, dependable and honest men, in their quest for the perfect mythological hero in shining armour. The one who is rich, good looking, exciting, dependable, honourable, loyal, and will love them despite their flaws (such as being fat, ugly, a bitch, drug/alcohol addicted, mental health problem, a slut etc.). They honestly believe such a human being will come, thanks to their belief in "soul mates", so they reject all the "normal" guys.

If a woman has ever called you a "soul mate" be VERY careful, in fact run!. Because that implies she views you as greater then human. The moment you show human qualities e.g. getting older or just plain getting her upset, she will reject you. Because in her mind a soul mate is someone who is perfect and can never make her unhappy, which is impossible, and the end result is women will NEVER be happy with such expectations"

[madmax]

Indomitable Thoughts wrote:

"Yeah, but I don't think the "women are always unhappy" argument explains why they're even more unhappy now. I think something genuine is going on.

Nature is a cruel mistress, feminists didn't realize that by pushing women into more powerful positions relative to the average man, the average man becomes less attractive to the average woman.

Feminists will argue that women should be equal to men, and on the surface, who could disagree? In the past, they saw that men were economically more powerful, and thought that was unfair. Some argue that a return to that system would just make women want men for their money. But they don't realize that this economic advantage also afforded attractiveness advantages because it made the man have a higher status. Men as a whole had a higher status, and as we all know women are attracted to higher status, so the average guy had no problems getting women.

Moreover, women foresaw that they needed a man and planned accordingly, instead of just screwing around, or going through one boyfriend after another (almost equally bad as screwing around in my book). So they didn't suffer the loss of oxytocin bonding that comes with so much male patronage. And this helped stability and gave men drive to do all they could. And thus women were happier.

Whatever your side, you're gonna have to agree that excluding 50% of the male college population off the bat is not a stable system. Whether feminist or not, it just doesn't work. You can't have that many unhappy men and expect to have happy women. It's mathematically impossible."